Doctor checking ear of smiling girlThe Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC) is one of 17 Ontario ministries that is required under the Environmental Bill of Rights (EBR) to include the public in its environmentally significant decision making. Click on a heading below to learn about the MOHLTC and its EBR requirements and performance.

 

 

Key Environmental Aspects of the Ministry's Mandate

The Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC) has a significant mandate and budget mostly focused on healthcare delivery. However, the ministry has the potential to positively affect the environment through its role promoting and protecting public health. The ministry develops policies and programs related to health promotion and preventative care. This can cover everything from promoting safe drinking water, to supporting walkable communities, to reducing human exposure to environmental health hazards. Environmental health is closely linked to human health; improving environmental outcomes, such as reducing air and water pollution, mitigating climate change, and increasing access to nature can prevent or reduce disease, and mental and physical ailments.

Environmental Bill of Rights (EBR) Requirements

Statement of Environmental Values

Each ministry that is prescribed under the Environmental Bill of Rights (EBR) is required to develop a Statement of Environmental Values to guide ministry staff when making decisions that might significantly affect the environment. Read the Statement of Environmental Values of the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC).

Public Notice and Consultation

Each ministry that is prescribed under the EBR is required to consult the public on certain environmentally significant proposals via the Environmental Registry. Specifically, the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care must give notice of, and consult on any proposal to make or amend a policy or act that could have a significant effect on the environment.

In addition, the MOHLTC is also required to provide notice and consult with the public on any environmentally significant regulation, or amendment to a regulation, made under the Health Protection and Promotion Act, that relates to small drinking water systems.

Applications for Review

Under the EBR, members of the public can ask the MOHLTC to review the need for a new environmental policy, act or regulation. In addition, the public may ask the ministry to review: any of the MOHLTC’s existing environmentally significant policies; the portion of the Health Protection and Promotion Act that relates to small drinking water systems; or regulations made under this Act that relate to small drinking water systems.

The MOHLTC is required to consider all such requests, and to respond within 60 days of receiving the application to let both the applicants and the ECO know whether or not it will undertake the requested review.

Pending Requests for Review

The Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care does not have any outstanding Applications for Review.

Applications for Investigation

Under the EBR, members of the public can ask certain ministries to investigate alleged contraventions of certain acts, regulations and instruments. The MOHLTC does not administer any acts that are prescribed under the EBR for Applications for Investigation.

EBR Commitment Letter

In December 2015, the ECO invited prescribed ministries to renew their commitment to the EBR in writing. Read the ministry’s recommitment to the Environmental Bill of Rights.

EBR Report Card

The ECO evaluates prescribed ministries’ performance under the EBR. Here is the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care's EBR report card for the 2016/2017 reporting year.

ECO Comment: The MOHLTC has a relatively low EBR workload. There was little material with which the ECO could evaluate the MOHLTC’s execution of its EBR responsibilities in 2016/2017, as the ministry did not post any notices on the Environmental Registry and was not responsible for any applications. The ECO is happy to report that the MOHLTC’s EBR co-ordinator attended an EBR compliance information session in September 2016. Going forward, the ECO encourages the MOHLTC to contact our office for any assistance in understanding and complying with its EBR responsibilities, including: ensuring that it posts clearly written and sufficiently detailed notices of any environmentally significant proposals on the Environmental Registry for public consultation; giving prompt notice of its decisions on such proposals on the Registry; handling any applications for review in accordance with EBR requirements; and considering its Statement of Environmental Values when making those decisions. The MOHLTC is also encouraged to co-operate with any ECO requests for information.

Category
Result
Trend
Comments
Quality of notices for policies, acts and regulations posted on the Environmental Registry
N/A
N/A
The MOHLTC did not post any policy, act or regulation notices in 2016/2017.
Quality of notices for instruments posted on the Environmental Registry
N/A
N/A
The MOHLTC is not required to post instrument notices on the Environmental Registry.
Promptness of posting decision notices on the Environmental Registry
N/A
N/A
The MOHLTC did not post any decision notices in 2016/2017.
Keeping notices on the Environmental Registry up to date
N/A
N/A
The MOHLTC did not have any open proposals on the Environmental Registry at the end of 2016/2017.
Handling of Applications for Review and Investigation
N/A
N/A
The MOHLTC did not conclude any applications for review under the EBR in 2016/2017. The MOHLTC is not prescribed for applications for investigation under the EBR.
Avoiding overdue applications for review
N/A
N/A
The MOHLTC did not have any open applications for review under the EBR at the end of 2016/2017.
Considering Statements of Environmental Values (SEVs)
N/A
N/A
The ECO did not request proof of SEV consideration from the MOHLTC in 2016/2017.
Co-operation with ECO Requests
No Change in Trend icon
At the ECO’s request, the MOHLTC’s EBR co-ordinator did attend an EBR compliance information session at the ECO’s offices in September 2016.
N/A (not applicable): The ministry is not prescribed for purposes of this category of EBR performance, or the ministry did not execute any responsibilities under this category in the reporting year.
Legend

Quality of Performance

Meets or exceeds expectations
Needs improvement
Unacceptable

Trend

Overall quality of performance unchanged since 2015/2016 icon
Overall quality of performance unchanged since 2015/2016
Overall quality of performance has improved since 2015/2016 icon
Overall quality of performance has improved since 2015/2016
Overall quality of performance has declined since 2015/2016 icon
Overall quality of performance has declined since 2015/2016

Ministry Comment

No comment provided by the ministry.

To view other ministries’ EBR report cards, go to Government Performance on this website and select the ministry of your choice.

The ECO’s full report to the Legislative Assembly on the 2016/2017 EBR report cards can be accessed here.

Key Outstanding ECO Recommendations

In our reports, the ECO makes recommendations to improve EBR compliance and environmental protection. The Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care does not have any outstanding ECO recommendations.

ECO Recognition Award

Since 2000, the annual ECO Recognition Award has recognized the hard work of ministry staff in an initiative that benefits Ontario’s environment and meets the goals of the EBR. Every year, the ECO asks prescribed ministries to submit programs and projects to be considered for the award. The Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care has not yet been the recipient of the ECO Recognition Award.

Return to Top